Being a best-in-class operator

Opinion Piece by Alastair Scott Nowadays, the integration of tech in hospitality has become synonymous with success. I talk to companies who mistakenly think they are best-in-class, simply because they use a software package to support operations. That is so far from the truth. As with all tools, having it is one thing, and using it well is completely another. You should see me versus my finance team on Excel!  This is certainly true when it comes to using technology to help grow profits. In which case, numbers 1,2,3 and 4 on the list are to grow sales. After that, people use tools to help focus on gross profit, and then they give operating costs an inspection. It’s only when all of those areas are exhausted that people look at labour management.   I get it. Labour is hard; labour is people; labour gets a reaction and some resistance. But to be a best-in-class operator, labour can’t be ignored, because it affects both cost and service. With the gap between best-in-class and average accelerating, I think understanding and managing labour better will become the determining factor.   So, how do you measure the effectiveness of your labour management? Labour ratio has been the historic measure of success, but the challenge with labour ratio is that a beer-led operator can run at a ratio of under 20% (coffee and cocktails make it harder), and a fine dining establishment might be heading towards a 40% ratio, so the success of labour management is difficult to measure this way.  In our restaurants, our preferred measure is slack, which is a measure of the excess labour over the agreed service standards of the business.   For many businesses, whether they are wet-led, food-led, high-end, or quick service, 25% slack is good. But even within this, scale matters.   The bigger the business, the lower slack can go. This is because shift patterns can be better designed with more team members, so a slack measure of 15% is not unachievable for large sites.  Why is it important? Service and staff. We have repeatedly evidenced that having too many staff on shift leads to worse service than too few staff. But even so, running shifts with too few staff causes a lot of stress for the team, who will feel no job satisfaction or reward from what could be a really energising session.   That’s why rightsizing your business is important, because it will lead to happier staff and better service.   Over the last decade, our attitude to labour management has been forced to change as labour is more expensive and good people are scarcer. People are also less tolerant of an unhappy, pressurised, or boring workplace.   The tools to become amazing have become increasingly good. We can now measure most of what we need to, and design and determine programs that will improve the quality and profitability of our industry.    Best-in-class has gotten better. Labour is becoming a much bigger differentiating factor between thriving and surviving than it has been historically, so maybe, it might move up the list. 

Christmas rostering

How should we be rostering our teams at Christmas?

 

Christmas is a welcome interlude between the depths of November and January. It is short-lived, but we typically have two objectives. First, to give the customer a great experience so that they come back, and second, to take in as many customers as we can and make as much money as possible for the quiet months ahead.

There is a real challenge over Christmas to find the right balance between team and customer. Many businesses close on key days to give the teams a break. Others, like me, try to keep going all the way through. We ask the team, and our returning students, to do as many hours as possible, recognising that hours might be a bit scarcer in January.

I have always argued that you can make more on Christmas day than in the whole of January if you are in the Christmas day lunch brigade and maximising those busy pre-Christmas celebrations and parties. Many of these companies can make well over 25% of their annual profits in this period.

Trading patterns and bookings vary so much during the Christmas period and rostering becomes a much bigger challenge.

Being able to see planned events and add staff when you are busy, rather than just evenly scheduling people over the day, is a key skill. It is also one that I think is often undervalued. A blanket increase in staff can often just waste valuable profits.

The key challenge here is finding staff, communicating with them, motivating them, rewarding them, and keeping them energised during their shift. We deliberately call understaffing ‘stress’, because this is the outcome when these things don’t happen.

One of the first questions I ask when we have beaten forecast by a long way is: how were the staff? A busy shift may mean great sales, but it can also lead to a demoralised team when sales forecasting and shift planning aren’t in play.

When you have a small team on, say 5, you can get away without a good shift plan or shift brief. As you start to grow your numbers, however, this is not possible.

On busy days, a shift plan may be the first thing to be ignored, or not thought through properly. This leads to failure in service and frustrations in staff. A poor, on the hoof staff allocation is no match for a well-thought-out shift planning template.

And that’s not all we need to consider. At the same time as wanting to avoid stress, we are often happy with any labour ratio over the Christmas period because it beats budget. That’s why we still need to be paying attention to our base and flex budgets. This will ensure that in our exuberance over a good sales line, we don’t just overstaff, particularly on the quieter days.

Here’s to hoping as an industry we have a great Christmas, deliver service which makes our customers want to come back to cover the inevitable tougher times in January.

Tempted to template?

Using templates to rota hospitality teams

The use of rota templates in the hospitality industry can be divisive. They speed up the rota-writing process, but the risk is that the team become lazy and merely load a template and publish the rota. It’s quick and efficient, but not necessarily optimising the business and managing the labour cost.

For some, the idea of using a template rota has other drawbacks, including inflexibility, with staff preferences being lost in the mix. I am in the opposite camp. For me, the best way to write a rota is to start with a template, probably one that has been written with a lot of thought and refinement and at the nearest sales level below the target for the week.

For example, if you are forecasting a 25k week, you load the rota for a 20k week. Then, some time and energy can be spent refining that rota. You can adjust the kitchen team if someone is on holiday, find extra staff for that Saturday afternoon event, add someone onto a Saturday night to excel at service delivery and spend per head, and remove a few midweek shifts to meet the budget. Creating rotas this way gives assurance that you have enough staff to match demand and optimise business, whilst giving the flexibility needed for different occasions and different staff.

With improvements to the S4labour system, you can load template rotas by department with the team already assigned, or you can drag and drop the right people against the right shifts. You have visibility of deployment, and can stay on top of labour costs. Now, over 70% of rotas are written using templates, up from around 40% historically. Across the industry, operators are reducing rota-writing speed and refining output.

UK Productivity

Opinion Piece by Alastair Scott

There are a few causes of the lack of improvement in UK productivity. Some research sites a lack of investment. Other research released recently suggests that working from home causes an 18% dip in productivity.  

We can’t afford to increase staff wages any higher, and our staff can’t make a return to a workplace they never left. So, what is it specifically that impacts productivity in our industry?  

Productivity is driven in two parts: motivation and engagement, and secondly, deployment. In any case, we can expect that when people are under too much pressure, service levels drop. That’s where technology comes in. 

Every hour of labour has a cost, but often, it does not deliver the same return in sales. Over the years, a lot of industry tech has worked towards rectifying this.  

The biggest changes to technology have been payment processes. Tapping a credit card is so much faster than changing cash. Self-ordering has also had a major impact, with lots more to come in this area, I suspect. 

Kitchen technology has changed less. The obvious move to using specialist machines to do the bulk of kitchen work has to be balanced against the loss of quality.  

It is early stages, but these innovations will take work out in bigger establishments over time. 

Work-reducing developments have led to a theoretical 10% improvement in productivity. But here, the rubber meets the road.  

If you only have three people on a shift, then a 10% improvement in productivity doesn’t allow you to save a team member, so no actual productivity is made because you’re not getting more done for less cost. It merely makes the job easier for the member of staff.  

How much can a team member deliver? Has it gone up as a result of technological improvements, or has it gone down because we can’t expect our teams to work as hard as we once did?  

The truth is that if we put our people under too much pressure then service levels drop. We fail to serve people at the bar fast enough; we fail to offer a second drink; we fail to get the bill down fast enough and turn the table; and most importantly, we fail to say goodbye. 

Shift productivity can be boosted by 25% with effective deployment. It’s about telling your team when you need them, where you need them and what you need them doing. The rest will follow: great guest experience, upsell, improved team engagement and increased revenue. 

So, there’s a real skill there, which is not asking our teams to work under pressure, but to match supply and demand as well as we can and help make our teams happy, fulfilled, and productive. That is when they work at their best. 

Labour management through a lens

Thought leadership by Alastair Scott

When I ran All Bar One, one of the disciplines instilled in us was to send out a weekly e-mail to our team. We did it on Sunday to show to our teams that they weren’t alone on the day, even if we weren’t there in person. 

It was hard. Firstly, thinking of something to say that was either relevant, profound, or uplifting. Something that rallied the team but also made them better; something that highlighted different members of the team every week so that over time everyone felt special and important. And let us not forget the many from head office also copied in, who were probably more eager to criticise than to praise.  

But we all knew the value of some well-chosen words, kindly meant, to everyone’s spirit and enthusiasm. I have no clue how many times I failed or succeeded, or indeed how many times I annoyed my wife by heading off for an hour to the study every Sunday morning. 

Anyway, I have now volunteered to do the same thing in Propel. Every (other) week, I hope to share something that will hopefully help lift people’s spirits, improve their skill, or make them more determined. 

Since running All Bar One, I have become a bit of a labour management anorak. I see most of the world through a labour management lens. I look at team productivity wherever I go – whether I am on holiday, at a railway station or an airport, in a supermarket checkout, or of course in a hospitality venue. 

And what do I see? Often people with not enough to do; people who don’t know what else to do; people who are bored; people who just want the day to pass and then they can go home. 

But when I see people who are engaged, working hard, who know what their purpose is and who seek work and see the customer, service is a joy to watch. This summer I have been so impressed by the Jet2 team, always happy to sort your problems out, in stark contrast to the train teams at so many stations, who don’t seem to have any work today and God forbid try and help a customer.  

I have been impressed by Greek waiters making roses out of napkins. I have been really impressed by the people working hard in the security section at airports, who seem to have been more helpful and constructive than I remember.  

It has been a great reminder that we should always pay attention to other industries and other countries, observing their best and noting their worst, and resolving to raise our own standards where we can. Our only success in hospitality is when we offer great value to our customers. The value of some carefully selected words, a friendly smile, and some small elements of attention, are as important as the food and drink that go with it. And we forget or ignore these things at our peril. 

Paul Charity has kindly agreed to let me write a fortnightly column on labour management in Propel. Labour management is not just about cost control, although it is one of the critical elements of the job.  

Increasingly, labour management is about setting the right environment for our people to thrive. Not bored, but focused energised and loving their jobs. That is my purpose. 

Industry reports strong year-on-year growth for September

Hospitality sees an impressive surge in like-for-like sales for the month of September, as reported by S4labour. Overall, the sector experienced a remarkable 9.6% increase in year-on-year sales. 

London led the charge with an 11.5% boost, with growth underpinned by a 16.7% increase in food sales. 

Non-London regions across the UK also experienced robust growth, with a 9.1% increase in like-for-like sales compared to the same period last year. 

Richard Hartley, Chief Growth Officer at S4labour, commented: “These figures come as a much-needed boost to the UK’s hospitality sector and are ahead of inflation levels for the first time in a while. The good weather in September likely helped with this resurgence in consumer confidence for dining out. As we move into the final quarter of 2023, we should be cautiously optimistic about sustaining this upward trajectory.”